PC25-05
| 1 | | | PC RESOLUTION | CONSIDER APPROVING MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF MARCH 25, 2025
CEQA: This is not a project as defined by CEQA | | |
Not available
|
Video
|
PC25-06
| 1 | | | PC RESOLUTION | APPROVAL OF MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW AND A 23rd STREET SPECIFIC PLAN COMPATIBLE USE DETERMINATION TO ALLOW THE CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING 1,386 SQUARE FOOT WAREHOUSE INTO AN OFF-SITE KITCHEN FOR A LOCAL RESTAURANT CHAIN, AND THE CONVERSION AND EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING 192 SQUARE FOOT STORAGE BUILDING INTO A 734 SQUARE FOOT TAKEOUT RESTAURANT, TO BE LOCATED IN THE SP-1, 23RD STREET SPECIFIC PLAN, COMMERCIAL MIXED-USE DISTRICT, ALONG WITH A FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15303 NEW CONSTRUCTION OR CONVERSION OF SMALL STRUCTURES, AT 2229 DOVER AVE AND 1927 23RD STREET, SAN PABLO, APNS: 411-201-014 & 411-201-013
CEQA: This project is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15303, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures as it involves the conversion and minor expansion of an existing warehouse building and an accessory building of less than 2,500 square feet to a new commercial use. | | |
Not available
|
Video
|
PC25-07
| 1 | | | PC RESOLUTION | RESOLUTION APPROVING REVISIONS TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MIXED-USE PROJECT TO REMOVE THE PROPOSED THIRD STORY, MAKE FLOORPLAN MODIFICATIONS, AND ADD A RESIDENTIAL UNIT TO THE FIRST FLOOR OF A THREE-STORY, 11,541 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION CONTAINING SEVEN MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 3,072 SQUARE FEET OF NEW COMMERCIAL SPACE, WITH THE REVISED PROJECT INCLUDING A TOTAL OF 13,828 SQUARE FEET, WITH NINE RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 5,828 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE, AT 1982 - 1988/1992 23RD STREET, SAN PABLO, LOCATED IN THE 23RD STREET SPECIFIC PLAN’S COMMERCIAL MIXED USE DISTRICT (APN 411-190-048).
CEQA: This project is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects, as it involves development on a site that is five acres or less, is surrounded by urban uses, has no habitat value, is adequately served by all required utilities and public services, would not result in any significant effects on traffic, noise or air quality, and would be consistent with general plan and zoning regulations. Furthermore, the proje | | |
Not available
|
Video
|