|
#PC23-24
| 1 | 1. | | PC RESOLUTION | CONSIDER APPROVING MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF AUGUST 22, 2023
CEQA: This is not a project as defined by CEQA. | | |
Not available
|
Not available
|
|
#PC23-22
| 1 | 2. | | PC RESOLUTION | CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE CITY OF SAN PABLO CONTRA COSTA COLLEGE MOBILITY HUB PLAN
CEQA: this project is statutorily exempt from CEQA under the provisions of Senate Bill 288 which created an exemption from environmental review in in Public Resources Code Sections 21080.20 and 21080.25 for pedestrian and bicycle facilities and projects that improve customer information and wayfinding for transit riders, bicyclists, and pedestrians. | | |
Not available
|
Video
|
|
#PC23-25
| 1 | 3. | | PC RESOLUTION | PLAN2310-0003, AMENDMENT TO THE SAN PABLO ZONING CODE CHAPTER 17.60, SPECIAL RESIDENTIAL USES, SECTION 17.60.070, ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, CONCERNING PROCEDURES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (ADUS). | | |
Not available
|
Video
|
|
#PC23-23
| 1 | 4. | | PC RESOLUTION | CONSIDERATION OF A FINDING OF GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY FOR THE DISPOSITION OF A PARCEL LOCATED ON VALE ROAD WITH APN 417-190-023 BY THE CITY OF SAN PABLO, AS REQUIRED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65402.
CEQA: The Planning Commission’s conformity finding is not a “project” pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15378 because it is not a discretionary approval and is simply an administrative activity that will not result in any direct or indirect environmental impacts. Even if the conformity finding was considered a project, it would be exempt from review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15061(b)(3), the common-sense exemption, in that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. Any subsequent proposed development of the property by will require review under CEQA. | | |
Not available
|
Video
|