Skip to main content
San Pablo header
File #: #17-0500    Version: 1 Name:
Type: RESOLUTION Status: Passed
File created: 11/28/2017 In control: City Council
On agenda: 12/18/2017 Final action: 12/19/2017
Title: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN PABLO (1) REJECTING ALL BIDS RECEIVED FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT ELEVATOR HALL FOUNDATION REPAIR PROJECT (PDT-ELV) DUE TO INSUFFICIENT FUNDS AVAILABLE AND (2) AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO RE-BID THE PROJECT WITH MODIFIED PLANS
Attachments: 1. RESO 2017-226 Reject bids Police elevator PDT-ELV and authorize rebid, 2. scope of work and schedule for Police Station Foundation, 3. PDT-ELV Bid Results

PREPARED BY: CAROL HUANG                      DATE OF MEETING:  12/18/2017

SUBJECT:                     

TITLE

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN PABLO (1) REJECTING ALL BIDS RECEIVED FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT ELEVATOR HALL FOUNDATION REPAIR PROJECT (PDT-ELV) DUE TO INSUFFICIENT FUNDS AVAILABLE AND (2) AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO RE-BID THE PROJECT WITH MODIFIED PLANS

 

Label

CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION

Recommendation

Adopt Resolution

 

Body

Compliance statements

CIP 2018-2021

Building Maintenance is an adopted policy item under the Infrastructure policy area of the FY 18-21 City Council Priority Workplan, effective November 1, 2017.

 

CEQA Compliance Statement

The project is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15302 of the CEQA Regulations, Replacement or Reconstruction. A Notice of Exemption was filed with the Contra Costa County Clerk on June 20, 2017.

 

BACKGROUND

The existing building which houses the Police Department at 13880 San Pablo Avenue was constructed in the late 1980’s. The elevator was added to the building a few years after the original construction. In 1996, the building was converted to its current use as a police station. After the 2014 Napa earthquake, settlement was observed in the vicinity of the elevator. In 2015, further evidence of settlement was observed.

 

On April 18, 2016, adopted Resolution 2016-0149 authorized a geotechnical consultant agreement with Miller Pacific Engineering Group (MPEG) to perform a geotechnical evaluation associated with the Police Department Elevator Hall Foundation Repair Project.

 

On September 28, 2016, staff requested a cost proposal from the City’s on-call civil engineering consultant, Bellecci & Associates, to provide the surveying and engineering services to mitigate the observed settlement at the Police Department. MPEG was also hired by Bellecci & Associates as the sub-consultant to perform geotechnical engineering services for the project. 

 

Based on recommendations from MPEG and Bellecci & Associates, the project scope included localized underpinning of the elevator structure using helical anchors and removal and replacement of the existing slab-on-grade floor.

 

On September 1, 2017, the project was advertised with formal bid requirements but no bids was received.

 

On November 6, 2017, the project was re-advertised as an informal bid in conformance with Section 3.16.070 of the Municipal Code and the submittals were opened on December 4, 2017. Only one bid was received from Pleasanton Engineering Contractors, which was $98,100, significantly exceeding the engineer’s estimate of $47,925 and the allocated funding.

 

A funding allocation of $75,000 was previously approved for the project under account number 320-3200-43600-PDT-ELV, and an amount of $12,041 was set aside for the engineering services provided by Bellecci & Associates. The project expenditure and available funding balance is summarized below:

 

REVENUE

EXPENDITURE

Approved funding allocation for the Project

$75,000.00

Surveying and Engineering Services by Bellecci & Associates

$12,041

 

Building Permit Fee to Development Services

$1,890

 

Advertisement Cost for first advertisement

$283

 

Advertisement Cost for first re-bid

$300 (estimation only)

 

Subtotal

$14,514

Remaining project budget

$60,486

 

There are insufficient funds to award the project. Staff will conduct a value engineering study of the project in an effort to reduce costs. At this time, staff is recommending Council reject the received bid and direct staff to modify the plans to reduce the cost and then re-advertise.

 

FISCAL IMPACT

At this time, there is no additional fiscal impact to the General Fund.